PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF447 Thread No. 3
View Single Post
Old 13th Jun 2011, 01:45
  #1893 (permalink)  
bearfoil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
JD-EE

Chill ma'am, have a cocoa. You insinuate with a broad brush that Airbus has no further need to 'leak'. Does that mean you have begun to look a bit askance at the player(s)? I think 447 is entitled to negotiate energy for altitude, No?

Wait, what is the net deltaE? Can I say that? From 0.82M to tail slide in 60 seconds? At an average velocity of (Reported) 4,000fpm? Both engines were running at cruise thrust, I can't see where my opinion deserves such savagery.

Explain? Small Data, Bold imagery?


edit. I should let RR speak for himself, but you miss the logic in his example.

He speaks of Onset, Emergence, and Presentation. Gradual, it is an ok thing.

Are you thinking the airdata was bunk? That the reads were bogus? They could have been actual, which would explain the attenuation of the cricketSTALL <60knots. And its reacquisition for the "Real" cricket Stall.

The a/c thought it was ok to climb, it helped. It trimmed while the PF worked the elevators. At the top, the elevators were exhausted, and the THS was 'stuck' (to include PE, possibly)?

Last edited by bearfoil; 13th Jun 2011 at 01:58.