Indeed, we can agree, and it may not even be to disagree. I'm not attempting to assert that I understand the best practices of flight instruction. I continue to learn, and to do my job better. I always want to understand how the "average" pilot would fly a plane. I want to sort of "average proof" it by design. That is not to say that I am above average, I'm certain that I am below average in some types I fly, I just pick ideal conditions and circumstances, and prepare lots. Hopefully that makes up a bit for some below average skills I might demonstrate.
That said, when I'm evaluating a plane, I'm trying to figure out what the "average" pilot would do if things start happening fast, and to make sure that the plane will perform well enough to meet the minimun standard, and that pilot's expectations.
I simply have not yet formed my opinion as to what training and experience a pilot should be able to go without, and still be adequately compotent.
The Vmca discussion seems particularly relevent, as I completely agree about smoking holes beside runways, and must never make one. I should know better! Thanks for the facinating discussion (but not to truncate it for anyone else!)