PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Chinook - Still Hitting Back 3 (Merged)
View Single Post
Old 9th Jun 2011, 16:12
  #7794 (permalink)  
dervish
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Walter Kennedy

bluster and obfuscation is disgorged from the airworthiness flock
As far as I can see all that is being said here is the aircraft did not meet the airworthiness standards on the day of the crash and those saying this have offered pretty conclusive proof. I agree that this failing is sufficient to cast doubt on the verdict and can only lend weight to the other main argument that the legal test in AP3207 wasn't satisfied.


It really does take a special kind of imbecile to come on an aviation forum and openly state he doesn't agree with the need to have airworthy aircraft.
dervish is offline