JD-EE
according the reference the warning could have been caused by turbulence in combination with the FL, roll to the right, reduced mach 0.8 and turbulence, correct?
At least i think itīs more probable than any other discussed scenario.
If it was "close" and the stall warnings were transient, that suggests the PF should have done nothing for long enough to see if the warning would go away.
Correct, however there was that roll, that probably motivated the PF to do something, at least counter the roll by opposite input. I dont know, wether the computers would assist the opposite roll with the apropriate rudder input or wether it would be inhibited by alt LAW and wether that started the whole outcome.