HN39,
The wording of the FCOM suggests that there is no stall warning in normal law. Alternate law is a low-probability failure condition in which an airplane is not required to meet all requirements that apply normally.
That’s right. I figured the stall warning could also activate in normal law. Same reason probably for not having low speed longitudinal static stability in ALT law. Or am I missing something?
While there may be a logical answer I am still wondering about why activation of the stall alarm does not simultaneously prevent further auto-trim induced nose up THS move as does AoA protection activation in normal law?