For one thing, as a "subset", ABNORMAL LAW IS technically "ALTERNATE LAW", and until one sees the actual data, perhaps BEA is parsing the Camel? So let's be broad minded, give the benefit of the doubt to BEA and entertain that the a/c went DIRECTLY into Abnormal Law.
For discussion only, the slim pickens are well short of any definitive answers, by design, I would say. Not even bear is pushing a theory at this point.
"Calling for conclusions not based on facts in evidence". .....Perry Mason 101.
"Any change in available controls, operation, limits, or results shall constitute a LAW change." Don't change the rules and call it something it ain't.