Shogan1977
I prefer to see facts rather than claims in a self serving article (lawyereese speak)
The above is nicely laid out to assess blame before the report is finished.
Such words as culpability have no meaning without examining all facts
Also I really don't understand how one can assign a regulatory word of "catastrophic" to a single system manufactuer such as "Thales". The presumption should have been a simple failure condition (if operated outside its certified enevelop) to be accomodated by the installer (Airbus)