I posted elsewhere, but as you indicate, there will turn out to be a significant degree of unrecognised spatial disorientation in the accident, probably somatogravic with false sensation of pitch down leading to nose up command and stall.
What garbage.
I suspect that whatever BEA comes up with will be controversial. We can record what the plane does on the DFDR. We can record what the flight crew says on the CVR. But what we cannot record is WHY they did what they did, unless they say so explicitly, which rarely happens. There is no mind reading device; it doesn't exist. Correlation doesn't equal causation.
Because we cannot read their minds and know their motivations, we are left with being able to only judge the process and the result. The result we already know, and we labor under the burden of hindsight bias. So that just leaves the process. Did they follow their training? Were their actions up to professional standards? If the answer is yes, then the cause of the accident lies elsewhere.