Hi,
Shogan 1977
From SLF perspective it would be so much easier to swallow 'human error' as sole/major factor. That means when one flies over the ocean in the dark we can reassure ourselves with the thought that the pilots of this plane won't make the same mistake because... they're smarter/more experienced/not arrogant/not French/will have learned from AF447....
But reading all these posts two things stand out for me:
- Yes, clearly this accident COULD have been avoided, if the right action had been taken BUT who is to say any of you pilots would do the right thing?
- If the stall warning is (a) intermittent and (b) alarming when you do the right thing and silent when you do the wrong thing, it is human nature to be confused - question your actions, especially under stress.
That combined with the statements in this discussion by professional pilots that express arrogance, defensiveness, fear/"there but for..."/lack of trust in aircraft/technology... makes this SLF question the very people in the front seat who we depend on to get us there safely; the training provided by airlines and modern cockpit design.
Not a happy place to be
The statistics show that air travel is the safest
The statistics also show that 80 % of the accidents are the result of pilot error
So when you take place in a plane .. you know that if thing go wrong .. you have 80 % to go not go out of a survivable accident
Or at least .. 20% of the pilots are good in abnormal situations
That's the beauty of the statistics
Think about ........