Reading through the comments on this web site, it appears that 3 pilots made wrong decisions. They chose to fly through a storm when many airlines had deviated their course by miles. The Captain went for a nap knowing there was a storm ahead. The two copilots appeared to be poorly trained and unable to cope with issues.
You are rushing to judgement, prior to the release of the final report. Don't let the media spin on things warp your views of what really happened. Nothing so far says that the crew was poorly trained. You have simply made that assumption. There are too many inconsistencies in the report to understand what was going on, what the crew saw, and why they reacted the way they did.
As far as the captain going for his rest period, why do you see that as a problem? Flying across the equator through less-than-perfect weather is fairly common. The First Officer, who was presumably flying at the time, had more than twice the experience on that type of aircraft as the captain. The captain may have had full confidence in his abilities.
I hope Air France will be punished and the families compensated for what appears to be recklessness, arrogance and a total lack of professionalism from the pilots.
228 people died as a result.
Now you are truly jumping to conclusions before the incident has been fully explained. Judge, jury, and now you want to assign punishment even though you don't understand what transpired and why. I hope you never get on a jury, as it doesn't appear you would be swayed by any evidence that didn't fit your fixed opinion.
Arrogance? Recklessness? Lack of professionalism? Don't be absurd.