PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF447 Thread No. 3
View Single Post
Old 29th May 2011, 07:24
  #524 (permalink)  
Machinbird
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts on the initial climb and later, the implications of deep stall.
  • Alt 2 is a roll direct law. This means that the pilot flying will have to control bank angle. Only the aircraft's natural stability will tend to level the wings. Any turbulence will impart a bank angle until corrected.
  1. If PF had to fly the wings to keep them level, could he have inadvertently pulled the stick back while making corrections, either through nervous tension or bad personal geometry?
  2. And could his instrument scan have been so rusty that he didn't realize he was inducing a climb?
  3. Was there anything unusual about the copilots' stature, or technique in gripping the stick? (Realizing we ourselves don't really know who was PF but some guesses can be made).
  • Although ACARS does not specifically state that the aircraft later switched into Direct Law, and BEA has not told us (yet), It appears that after a significant period of deep stall, the AOA and A/S on all 3 ADRs had to have been considered unreliable by the system. How can even one Prim stay operational in this situation? If all 3 Prims are not available, the aircraft must be in Direct Law. That would explain the pitch trim staying at 13 degrees after the aircraft actually achieved a deep stall.
Machinbird is offline