Isn't it pathetic!
With well placed leaks it is slowly but persistently suggested that there was nothing wrong with the aircraft and now pilot error creeps in.
I don't know what the supposed icing up of pitots and a myriad of ACARS telling everybody that almost all systems showed a failure have to do with a well functioning aircraft system, but my idea of such is definitely different.
Furthermore there is not even one question or mention at this moment about how much authority the system still allowed the pilots, but their error is already more or less established.
Try establishing a guilt in front of any jury with such pathetic mind setting through the press and you'd be shot down in beautiful flames instantly by any first season lawyer.
But the big shots can do what they want in the press.
On a technical note:
A design that protects me as long as everything works fine is luxury. The same system that leaves the building in steps when the s#!t starts hitting the fan is a shame. What are protections for anyway when they are disconnected once there is a problem? I always assumed they were installed to protect me and the passengers in emergency situations.
It turns out that they are here merely to protect the manufacturer and the airline, in the sense that they are designed to go offline when problems arise and leave the hopeless case to the drivers.
At the moment I am disgusted. Hopefully the REAL report will be a little more objective.