Hi,
Flashback ..
A second reading of this release of BEA calls several criticisms:
What right does the BEA moves he can judge the morality of newspaper articles?
And in doing so .. take the role of a censor
This release of BEA is not better or worse than the newspaper article to which it refers.
The release of the BEA does not match the mission entrusted by the French government.
BEA's response would have been a denial or approval of the contents of the press articles
It appears nowhere in this release
BEA communication
According to an article in Le Figaro on the evening of Monday, May 16, 2011, the "first elements extracted from the black boxes would put Airbus out of the accident on the A330, Flight 447, which killed 216 passengers and 12 crew members on 1 June 2009.
Tribute to sensationalism by publishing unconfirmed information while exploiting the data flight recorder has just begun is an affront to the respect of passengers and crew members died and causes trouble among the families of victims who have already undergone many announcement effects. The BEA said that, as part of its mission as the authority for safety investigation, only he can communicate on the progress of the investigation. Thus, any information about the investigation from another source is null and void if it has not been confirmed by the BEA.
The collection of all data contained in records voice and flight parameters gives us today is virtually certain that all light will be shed on this incident.
Investigators will now have to analyze and validate various information. This is a long and painstaking and the BEA has already announced he will not issue an interim report before the summer.
At this stage of investigation, no conclusion can be drawn.