PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Aerodynamics ~ The Coaxial Myth?
View Single Post
Old 28th September 2002 | 03:56
  #5 (permalink)  
Dave Jackson
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Barannfin,

Yes, the 27% includes the tail rotor power. It includes all power requirements. This percentage change comes from Prouty's 'Blade Element Calculations for Hover'.

The actual improvement is much better than 1%. It's up to 10%. If the dry weight to payload ratio was 50/50, then the theoretical increase in the payload, for the coaxial over the single rotor, is up to 20%; and that's fairly significant.
_____________

Randy_g,

I understand that the co-axial rotor system works the same as the single rotor system in autorotation. The only difference is that the yaw flight control mechanism automatically switches the pedal inputs.
______________

widgeon,

As you say, synchronization is critical for the intermeshing configuration. It's not a serious concern in the coaxial configuration though.

Dave J

Edited to remove erroneous statement to widgeon; thanks to a correction by a knowledgeable reader.

Last edited by Dave Jackson; 1st October 2002 at 21:58.
Dave Jackson is offline