Hi Machinbird,
Originally Posted by Machinbird
I fully agree with your analysis as to how the ADRs were rejected on the Perpignan A320. It means that it would be harder to reject 3 ADRs of equivalent validity on AF447 by virtue of deep stall angle of attack, but still not impossible or even unlikely. I suspect the rejection mechanism would be primarily ram air impingement into the static ports.
I'm really curious to read your full explanation with such a "deep stalled" projected AoA achieved in normal law inside her full envelope protection; those ram air impingement into static ports able to trigger ADRs rejection without impacting her engine's air flow; explaining also this attitude at impact while she is still in a "deep stalled" and clean configuration; and the whole sequence lasting five minutes of descent from a very early upset before 0210.
Quite curious so.