Another interesting post............this time from EGLNYT
However it does look like a load of Bull
based on semantics. Some of it would appear to be plainly wrong.
It wasn't a NATS decision and it isn't in NATS power to reverse it.
Yes it was (Paul Baron) and yes it is given the right amount of lobbying.
The regulated business is kept seperate from the unregulated business
Are not NSL and NERL both regulated ?
How about some tangible evidence to back up what would seem at first glance an informed post.
But please spare us any nebulous comments like "possibility of infringing European competition law"
Cheers
