Witness J 7754
I am amazed that this witness was allowed to make the statement that Boeing Vertol had a vested interest in deterring any report that leaves them liable.
Surely someone from either the Company or MOD must have attempted to refute this statement later in the report.
If not, why were Boeing Vertol allowed to be the sole arbiters of the interpretation of events leading to the Mull crash.
They were always going to find any interpretation which freed the company from liability.
Good man Witness J. If he was allowed to make the statement without challenge, there must have been no possible defence.