What a brilliant glimpse into the past notlangley.
Note the comment about BA refusing to hold face to face talks whereas the court evidence was clear that BASSA and CC89 refused to sit in the same room.
The claim that CC89 had only 500-700 members is also wrong.
Also, note the comment that it would be "unethical" for a crew member leaving BA to take part in negotiations! What does that say about the sacked reps!?
And how many times has BASSA claimed that they offered BA savings just short of its target?