Regulatory decisons are typically based on expert input weighing the issues. This thread is mostly based on reaction to the decision rather than an expert balance of the issues that were considered.
lompaseo,
that's a negative. The EASA FTL revisions are deviod of expert input. They have been drafted ignoring the wealth of of information readily avaialble in numerous studies over the years, no decades. And is divergent from CAP371 and indeed divergent to what the FAA is doing in respect of fatigue.
Ergo, the the thread is not based on reaction, but the lack of peer reviewed and well published data and factual input into the FTL revisions.