Torque2 - I think you have missed the point of this thread - most of us are NOT discussing 'personal interpretations' but the way it is interpreted (or not) by companies and regulatory authorities. Obviously if the OM says "an IRVR (or a 'reported RVR') 'of >125m is required" that is an end to it. No-one is suggesting ignoring the OM and making up your mind on personal preferences. If the OM just says '"RVR>125m" and does not distinguish between pilot interpretation or other there can be confusion, as evidenced.
From FD post#9:
"many TREs differ in opinion, and some CAAs as well (evidenced by approved OM-As)"
The OP asked
"I'm wondering what your companies requirements are and what your opinion is about the above ."
We now know yours and Noaks. It is others we are seeking.