Originally Posted by takata
One will also note that this aircraft used a different (faulty?) hardware and would remember that this issue was not an "upset" properly: in fact, even if this situation could have caused some serious harm to the passengers, it did not cause an "upset" as the aircraft did not departed from its safe flight envelope (which doesn't mean that this problem was not dangerous for the aircraft safety).
The point on QF72 is that that airplane decided to do something on its own and on which the crew had absolutely no control.
In this case, this would mean that they were not aware of the weather situation as they were not flying in "turbulence penetration mode", having their A/THR still ON up to this point.
Unless thrust changes become excessive, it is not an Airbus request to disconnect A/THR for turbulence.
Originally Posted by dvv
The NIST team has studied WTC7 quite thoroughly, and the study only confirms that the 9/11 conspiracy nuts are just that — conspiracy nuts.
'Thoroughly' until you read it.
I can only encourage people to read
these guys too and evaluate if they qualify for the name of nuts ...