Originally Posted by Bearfoil
... As per ZeeDoktor, the transition between a docile machine and one that requires a stable set of anticipatory thinking only, the conclusion is quite apparent. (That this is a flaw in AB philosophy)
Well, Bearfoil... maybe?
But, at this point, finding only such an (obvious) conclusion is much more telling about what you will find very relevant in support of your own theories rather than giving a single hint about this manufacturer philosophy.
Everything opposed to your pre-fabricated opinion should otherwise being considered as a "cover-up" as you already mentioned many times this very same obvious and single conclusion (I remember that you even mentioned that Airbus/BEA would not try to recover this aircraft as they already know pretty well what caused this loss).
Nothing very new.
