PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why no aircraft for skinny, long routes?
View Single Post
Old 7th April 2011 | 09:59
  #25 (permalink)  
Genghis the Engineer
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Genghis

The G V is a Part 25 plane, as are all business jets over 12,500, so no biz jet OEM is getting around FAR 25. Both Gulfstream and Bombardier AR selling north of 50 long-range business per year, EACH. There are over 400 Global Expresses, all FAR 25 certified. There is no 19 versus 20 seat distinction in FAR 25.

On point, the G8000, in development will be a 7900 nm plane which translates into 17+15, take-off to landing. Marketing press releases talk about HKG-NYC, non-stop.

GF
Fair point: 12,500lb/9 pax, or 19,000lb/19 pax for turbo/piston props.

I wonder then why Gulfstream specifically limited themselves to 19 seats? I don't think there's any advantage in this number in part 25? Is it a licencing / single pilot ops issues?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply