Given the Caroline Tulip matter tested the bounds, I can't imagine why anyone would be so stupid as to put such an amount of detail on the public domain that was untrue if it could not be verified under oath.
It would seem from the last post that a witch hunt is under way, not to investigate the claims, but to persecute the author.
This plus the absence of repudiating statements is intriguing in itself and lends credence to that detail if those mentioned are reluctant to test the claims in public.
Perhaps they will be tested under parliamentary Privilege in the Senate.