PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 6th Apr 2011, 00:12
  #110 (permalink)  
Zeffy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KBDL RNAV (RNP) 15, why is there a wingspan limitation. I'm based there and it escapes me.


Unlike an ILS, an airplane flying an RNP approach may encounter an RF leg in the final.

The RF leg may require significant bank angle. (Not the case for this approach, but the issue remains applicable.)

The "down wing" on large airplanes can extend below the normal gear height. So appropriate allowances must be made.

Per Appendix 1 in the 8260.52, the assumptions are:

Semi-span for narrow body fixed at 68
Semi-span for wide body fixed at 131
Because the BDL procedure is restricted to Cat C aircraft, the designer also had to note that the approach was designed using narrow-body geometries. (2 X 68' = 136').

Hope you can win at least a few beer-bets with that bit of arcana, gf

"Amaze your friends !"
Zeffy is offline