PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 5th Apr 2011, 23:05
  #107 (permalink)  
FlightPathOBN
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The very few public RNP AR the third-party developers have developed are all quite simple at easy (not obstacle or terrain rich) airports. BDL and SAV come to mind.
exactly..I am very familiar with BDL....thats about all the FAA will let a 3rd party do...AND they gave themselves a waiver for the trees on the ridge on approach, but not for 3rd party...

KBDL RNAV (RNP) 15, why is there a wingspan limitation. I'm based there and it escapes me.
The wingspan limit is to keep the design within the parameters of a 737 NG.

KSAV--

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...overLetter.pdf

BTW...a 4.3r to a 5.2r is a busted curve....this must not fly very well...

You would have to ask Jepp what the hell they meant, it looks like radio fix, not RF turns...

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 5th Apr 2011 at 23:24.
FlightPathOBN is offline