Why is it when everything else in this world is requiring a higher prowess and aptitude to achieve than it used to.........did an easy version of flying become available all of a sudden.
And everything else in the world also requires an evidence base to show that it will work and the NPPL is no exception.
All the critics so far are suggesting that the minimum number of hours = poorer licence. Can anyone point me in the direction of the evidence that will back this up? (and I mean 32 as opposed to 45 rather than the slightly more obvious 1000 hours = slightly more experienced than 100!!!)
