PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 4th April 2011 | 02:11
  #81 (permalink)  
john_tullamarine
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
: ATPL
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
What I am having trouble with is is explaining to this forum, the plain and simple fact that TERPS and PANOPS public procedure designs are ALL engine missed

I don't think any of us have a problem with understanding that simple matter .. and that OEI remains the operator's (pilot's) problem.

you are telling me that the engines are spooled up, flaps are at Flaps 1, and you are climbing at ..

I presume you are talking 737. If a pilot couldn't do the miss and be reconfigured for the initial missed approach with GA thrust and climbing within 8 seconds ... one would be looking a bit seriously at him/her, I think.

A while since I last flew the 737 and my recollection might have faded a tad .. but why flap 1 ? My recollection is that the missed approach configuration is 15° and that 1° comes along a bit later during the climb.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply