PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 3rd Apr 2011, 19:31
  #77 (permalink)  
Pugilistic Animus
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
FAR 25 approach climb gradients for TERPS IAPs may be simply implied within the chart...similar to second segment limitation [a certification standard]---it might not say explicty, but implicit within other charts with an annotation such as "cross hatched area -does not meet approach climb limits" however for certain special cases it is up to the airline operation to meet FAR-121 and gain at least an equivalent level of safety as an engineering goal...altogether the TO case MUCH more difficult to meet than any other from what I've learned here from the performance engineers...

With regards to the IPH it's a very good publication aloowing pilots to better understand TERPS criteria and the NAS

Zeffy I'm in that thread...
Pugilistic Animus is offline