PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 21:08
  #73 (permalink)  
HazelNuts39
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Pugilistic Animus;

I understand the IPH is educational rather than regulatory, and find this statement somewhat simplistic:
Typically, the AFM for a large turbine powered airplane should contain information that allows flight crews to determine that the airplane will be capable of performing: (...)
• Climb from the missed approach point (MAP) and maintain a specified climb gradient with one engine inoperative.
FAR 25.1587(b)(3) requires the AFM to provide no more than:
(3) The following performance information (determined by extrapolation and computed for the range of weights between the maximum landing weight and the maximum takeoff weight):

(i) Climb in the landing configuration.

(ii) Climb in the approach configuration.

(iii) Landing distance.
Regards,
HN39
HazelNuts39 is offline