PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 18:56
  #67 (permalink)  
Pugilistic Animus
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Aterpster
Paragraph 7 seems to be dealing with DP and SIDs...I'm not suggesting that TO OEI flight path is based on following a SID or DP only the approach climb I though a minimum climb gradient over the OCS is specified in the initial design-for OEI approach climb and AEO landing climb-as district from OEI special procedures for TO, perhaps I'm loose with my phrasing...I'm not suggesting following the SID or any other Flight path for obstacle avoidance for EFATO...I'm only referring to the approach climb


sorry, that except is from the 'instrument procedures handbook'...

edit Pprune automatically writes out engine failure on TO for EFATO not me

see EFATO, EFATO, EFATO
Pugilistic Animus is offline