PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 1st Apr 2011, 15:28
  #57 (permalink)  
FlightPathOBN
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take the time and review the AC120 overview provided by the FAA to help clear up these types of issues.

Note page 12 EOP Criteria
Part 25 Min NET: 1.6%
AND
CFRPart 121.189.D(2):NET must clear all obstacle by 35 feet.

Note page 18, 19, 20
specifically what EOP's are NOT.

Note page 32.
KCOS Special procedures for Engine failure during takeoff or missed approach.
Note page 38
KRNO special missed approach engine out..note that on charts the EO path will be dashed. note that the EO missed track is NOT the same as the standard missed approach shown on page 37.

Note page 46
A one engine missed approach can FREQUENTLY be flown following the PUBLISHED missed approach procedure.
Doesnt this state that there is a difference? If the standard missed approach was EO, why state this?
FlightPathOBN is offline