PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Approach Climb Gradient vs EOSID
View Single Post
Old 1st Apr 2011, 01:04
  #49 (permalink)  
FlightPathOBN
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fatflyer..

Within the criteria, the missed is defined using the hottest day on record for the aerodrome, at max landing weight, and lowest engine performance. That is why the low numbers. If you apply that same standard to EO, performance is significantly less.

Does the chart you are using show an EO missed track?

The criteria uses all engine for the missed approach.

from an earlier post in this thread...

"EOPs are NOT TERPS Or PANS-OPS Criteria
EOPs Do Not Provide Takeoff Data
EOPs Do Not Provide Standard ATC Departure
EOPs Are Not Developed or “Flight Checked”
EOPs Are Not Promulgated Under CFR Part 97
EOPs Are Not “Approved” By The FAA they Are “Accepted”
And… if the EOP is Associated With a “Special” IAP That Involves Unique Terrain or Pilot Flight Skills the Following Applies:"

AC120_91overview
FlightPathOBN is offline