Nothing in that PP that is particularly relevant to this discussion that I can see. The thread is about following a takeoff EOSID procedure when conducting a Missed Approach.
Quote:
That landing wouldn't be legal because those gradients are way below the Approach Climb certification requirement of 2.1% (127ft/nm)
Again...
"EOPS do NOT need to meet TERPS requirements"
I can't see that Terps (or PANS OPS) has anything to do with the need to comply with the basic performance rules. Are you saying the performance requirement for Approach Climb (CAO 20.7.1b section 9) may be disregarded?