PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Decision to axe Harrier is "bonkers".
View Single Post
Old 24th Mar 2011, 21:33
  #421 (permalink)  
WE Branch Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,814
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
This Libya business will continue for a long time I expect. Two carriers involved now, and a US amphibious ship with AV8B+s. Will their contribution be studied in any post Operation Ellamy lessons learnt report?

What do we make of this?

THE government has moved to deny the Royal Air Force asked for an aircraft carrier to be sent to Libya to help enforce the no-fly zone.

It was rumoured the Prime Minister turned down air force chiefs who wanted a carrier and axed Harrier jump jets to be brought back to life to help out with the Libya mission.

Top defence analyst Francis Tusa told The News: ‘I’ve been told by grade A1 sources that the RAF wanted a flat-top but Number 10 simply wouldn’t allow it. I think they’d rather cut their own fingers off before that happened.’

The use of carrier strike would be embarrassing to the government after its controversial decision to axe HMS Ark Royal and the Harrier jets last year.

A Downing Street spokesman said: ‘This is not true. There’s been no request from the RAF.’

Mr Tusa said the RAF requested a carrier because Tornado jets cost £35,000 per hour to fly.

He added that Italy is charging ‘eye-watering’ amounts for use of a base. This was not confirmed by the MoD.


Also discussed here on the Daly History Blog.

And what if the situation in Yemen gets worse? Failed states on both sides of the Gulf of Aden, with AQAP and Al Shabab linking up to attack shipping?

As for Cdr Ward's blog - to be honest if the media do pay attention then good.

Last edited by WE Branch Fanatic; 24th Mar 2011 at 21:56.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline