PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Policy is not law – AAT buckets CASA decision
Old 24th Mar 2011, 01:27
  #22 (permalink)  
knightflyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torres

If CAR206 was solely about passenger safety, why then does is specifically include "....transporting cargo for persons generally"?

Torres the thing here is "persons generally". No bank runner / freight operator is carrying freight for "persons generally", they are chartered by say Freds Freight to shift the parcels dropped off to them. Even if this is to a fixed schedule it is not RPT. Nobody can walk up to the aircraft at port A and hand over a parcel and some money wanting said parcel taken to port B. If they could that is "persons generally" and now becomes RPT. This is the CASA interpretation of the rules the several times I have had the discussion. What they think now who knows - did I imply CASA thinks!?!
knightflyer is offline