Torres
You made my point for me (again) when you said this:
The alleged RPT operations is not in my opinion, necessary to consider in justifying the decision by CASA and supported by the AAT, in revoking the operator's AOC.
There was nothing ‘alleged’ about the RPT operations in Coral Sea: the AAT found the operations to be RPT, as a matter of fact. Your opinion about whether that finding was necessary to justify the decision is interesting, but irrelevant. The finding that the operation was RPT was taken into account by CASA and the AAT in their decisions, as a matter of fact.
Those facts may be inconvenient to some. But facts they remain.
It’s hypocrisy to shout from the rooftops when the AAT decides that CASA was incorrect in finding that an operation was RPT, on the one hand, then ignore or downplay an AAT decision that CASA was correct in finding that an operation was RPT, on the other