I do laugh at the fact that the usual suspects cite the AAT as an authoritative source when it makes a decision with which the usual suspects agree, and dismiss it as unauthoritative when it makes decisions with which they disagree.
The word 'hypocrisy' springs to mind, for some reason.
It's academic, of course. Any decade now, CASA will action the 15 year old 'urgent' recommendation, in respect of CAR 206, made by Commissioer Staunton in the Seaview Inquiry.