PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Policy is not law – AAT buckets CASA decision
Old 23rd Mar 2011, 00:59
  #7 (permalink)  
Air Ace
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: International
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the minor point that the QF AOC permits aerial work, charter, and RPT. QF also has their own travel agency.
Your thinking is along similar lines as CASA. Whether QF holds an AOC authorising RPT services is irrelevant. The Qantas flight over Antarctica can not be RPT and must therefore be classified as air charter. CASA's policy in the past, predicated on their incorrect interpretation of CAR206, has been that individual seats on an air charter service can not be sold via an interposed entity. The AAT decision now determins that individual seats may be sold on an air charter, via an interposed entity, where there is a common interest amongst those travelling.

Read the AAT decision.
Air Ace is offline