The interesting aspect is that the Qantas charters over Antarctica were not lawful under CASA's interpretation of CAR206 and Policy, but are now lawful in accordance with the AAT Decision.
What is the difference between the Qantas charters over Antarctica being sold on an individual seat basis via an interposed entity being a travel agency, and Direct Air's tourist flights between Darwin and Bathurst Island with seats sold on an individual basis via the tourist operator interposed entity?
As far as I can see, the only difference is one of size, muscle and financial and legal resources?