PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Decision to axe Harrier is "bonkers".
View Single Post
Old 21st Mar 2011, 19:45
  #378 (permalink)  
draken55
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kilmarnock,United Kingdom
Age: 68
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AutoBit

Totally agree with your post.

Initial use of the Tornado proved the point of keeping it rather than Harrier for the major scenario where the GR9 was known to be deficient. The fact that CAS is now being provided by carrier borne US Marine Corps Harrier's is water under the bridge. SDSR meant we decided to delete that capability last October! That always meant we would need to rely on others until we could get HNS and force re-positioning sorted out to then deploy nearer the scene.

As to the re-generation of carrier air that is as much to do with politics than anything else. If recent events lead to a change in the defence need and the political will is there, it could be restored by 2015 when QE completes. I really see no point using Illustrious and re-activating some GR9's. The UK could have a carrier deployable SEAD/AAR/Fighter and Strike capability in the Super Hornet leaving the RAF to buy the F-35C at a later date or even move to the A Model to fit in with the USAF if it can keep finding aircrew with wonder bladders

Last edited by draken55; 21st Mar 2011 at 20:45.
draken55 is offline