PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Battery powered Skyhawk
View Single Post
Old 15th March 2011 | 01:36
  #6 (permalink)  
K_9
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: USofA
Originally Posted by FlyingKiwi_73
i'm just worried about the size of the extension cord!!! surely the battery weight renders this idea useless?
Yes, because clearly 45 gallons of fuel, associated tanks, two gallons of oil, a 320 cubic inch internal combustion engine, two magnetos, an alternator, a starter, and a heavy prop have no weight whatsoever.

I think it's a marvelous idea. Purchase and maintenance costs on an electric motor are going to be hugely reduced over those of a gasoline engine, necessary electricity costs will be drastically lower than fuel costs of gasoline-powered Skyhawks, and once all the teething issues are solved, an electric motor will be much more reliable than an internal combustion engine.

Those of you bucking over this because it's different need to accept that progress requires setting aside some things we've grown to be comfortable with and moving onto newer and better things.
K_9 is offline  
Reply