Where do you find the figures showing bmi baby are doing better at the city, the stats I saw don't support this, and why would waiting on the STN, which didn't operate at BFS, give the fuller picture. I think their move, for zero charges and a share of the fuel revenue or whatever the full deal offered by the airport included, in response to the face of the threat to relocate or downsize the LHR has so far seriously underperformed and will in the longer term prove to be another very poor decision for an airline quite expert at making very poor decisions. My thoughts!