PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - approach climb 2.1% vs MACG 2.5% or greater
Old 13th Mar 2011, 11:47
  #27 (permalink)  
HazelNuts39
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aslan1982;

From the document you posted in your #19:
Procedure Missed Approach Gradient
- A conflict exists between JAR-25 and ICAO (...)
- The case of an engine failure during Go-around is not considered as this is deemed a remote possibility
catpinsan;

Re yr post #21: The Thirteenth Meeting of the Obstacle Clearance Panel (2003) added the following to the Foreword of ICAO Doc 8168 (PANS-OPS) :
1.5 The design of procedures in accordance with PANS-OPS criteria assumes normal operations. It is the responsibility of the operator to provide contingency procedures for abnormal and emergency operations.
Regards,
HN39

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 14th Mar 2011 at 16:36. Reason: PS deleted
HazelNuts39 is offline