BV,
Perhaps Renurrp fully intended to continue with his apparent public support while giving full rein to his private aim of making the individual's life truly miserable?
Bloggs,
"From what I can glean from the report, there aren't any significant CRM /Multi-crew issues or deficiencies here, especially those which could have been caused by the Captain's recent flying experience. From what was written, it sounds like the approach was pretty standard from a CRM point of view. There certainly weren't any one-man-bands, yelling and screaming, ignored support calls or mixed-up crew duties."
Well, really there was....
Centaurus,
There is GA experience that is invaluable and there is GA experience that has the potential to be a latent failure. In the context of the current Senate debate, here is a hypothetical for you: if you were a cadet thrown into GA after 12 years and you went flying unsupervised parachute school stuff for a year, how might that affect your future judgement back in your jet not long after when faced with a high energy marginal visual approach?
And generally,
"And as for the 717 stick shaker, it has been said, half tongue-in-cheek, that in the same situation, you'd have to pull 4g in a real Boeing to get the SS. The 717's SS is a sensitive beast."
The shaker was activated by a turbulence encounter in the base turn - the predictive algorithm can be quite vicious when you fall into a 1.4g "hole" - not specifically by the PF's handling.
The true value from an HF viewpoint of this whole incident (notwithstanding RENURRP's distortions) seems to have gone missing, unfortunately a hallmark of recent ATSB efforts.