Haymaker:
He doesn't seem too distraught with the current situation. Remember, the extension to his term of office (authorised by a 'democratic' show of hands) and therefore his branch remuneration only lasts as long as the dispute does. He would then have to seek re-election, which he cannot do as he is no longer a BA employee.
Apologies if this point has been raised before (but I couldn't see it, on a quick search).
We have all been reminded many times that there must be different reasons for a fresh ballot so, technically, has the initial dispute ended, enabling BASSA now to hold their elections?
Alternatively, is this an indication that the current ballot is connected to previous ones?