PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CAA standards
Thread: CAA standards
View Single Post
Old 28th February 2011 | 14:20
  #11 (permalink)  
lugs4744
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: doncaster
Right lets try this one more time and see if the message finally gets across.

AVGAS is not saying he doesnt feel he should have to sign for the engine cowl, he is saying that the workpack he is already using has an entry stating that ALL cowlings are installed so he doesn't see the need for ANOTHER seperate entry in the workpack for every single cowling/fastener/acces door.

Are you seriously trying to convince everyone that every time you open the access door to the ground power socket or open a door or magnetic flap to check fire bottle pressure you raise an entry.No, of course you don't.Two things, the jobcard for whatever component AVGAS was working on, that required the cowl to be removed would have "refit engine cowl" as it's final ops which means it's the responsibility of the engineer signing that task off to ensure the engine cowl is correctly fitted. Second the aircraft cannot leave until someone signs off the entry stating that all cowlings are fitted and closed correctly again this is the responsibility of the engineer signing this entry. I do not see any justification for adding a THIRD entry for an engine cowl.I could go to any maintenance organisation tomorrow look on any aircraft and find at least a dozen doors,panels,access flaps that have NEVER been raised as opened or removed.
lugs4744 is offline  
Reply