Since (from my own choice) I only see half of the current handbag fight, can I ask for a refresh here (to avoid trawling all the many posts)?
Have we established whether an FDR was fitted and if so which parameters it was likely to record - and thus whether or not the obviously vexing question for some (NOT involved in the investigation) about the port prop is likely to be cleared up in any report? My understanding is that the initial investigation declared 'engine ops normal' before the crash?
With apologies to the doubtless fine people who work there, I profess a total lack of interest in the IoM 'CAA' and do not see much relevance in the obvious furious slagging that it appears to generate.