PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Cessna 172 landing techniques - what is the difference?
Old 24th Feb 2011, 18:13
  #43 (permalink)  
corsair
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the 172 first gained tricycle gear, the brochure trumpeted it's 'land o matic' landing gear. Judging by some landings I've seen and.....ahem cough, cough, been on board for. Some people took that too literally. Carry a little too much speed on finals and it will float forever or at least until the hedge interrupts proceedings.

Personally like others I used to vary my approaches to match the circumstances. Flying into a 400 metre strip requires one approach style and a long airport runway requires another. The fastest I ever approached in a 172 was in Memphis, 120 mph over the threshold to avoid delaying the masses of DC9s lined up for departure and behind me.

I did come unstuck one day when I flew a 172 with a cruise prop. On a flat calm day, it just didn't want to come down. After three go arounds. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry.
corsair is offline