Gentlemen
Review my posts, I advocate ATC stepping in if they see some sort of config problem(gr up), and I am in favor of ATC pointing out what they see as a problem, such as you appear high, low etc. However the final say as to the safe operation of the aircraft must lie with the crew and more specifically the pilot in command.
Just as I dont see all that goes on in your job, you dont have the picture the crew does. The original poster believed that every controller must see this type of approach at least yearly, just aint so. The numbers just dont bear it out. Otherwise we would be lawn darting a few a day. There are times we will be high on final and still meet the parameters of a stabilized approach by 1000ft. Controller A might not send the plane around for what controller B will, just too hard to call. Again for clarification, tell us we look hi or low to aid in our decision making process, but leave the final decision to the pilots Allowing controllers to send folks around for issues beyond the perview of ATC places us on a slippery slope. What is next, is the short approach on the Cessna a bit too short? Send him around. The Attitude of an empty 757 climbing out a bit too much, tell him to shallow it out. That 737 is still doing 320 kts, better slow him down. I have no doubt that it is all very well intentioned, and that its no power trip, but leave the flying to me and I will leave the controlling to you. On a company computer in a rush so excuse spelling/grammer, blah blah